OSC v. Aaron Wolfe (insider trading, 2023)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2023 the Capital Markets Tribunal approved a settlement in which Aaron Wolfe admitted illegal insider trading in Tahoe Resources shares in November 2018, using information about a proposed acquisition that he obtained from a third party. He agreed to an administrative penalty of C$200,000, disgorgement of C$125,064 and costs of C$15,000.
The record
| Agency | OSC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 2023-5 |
| Date filed | 2023-02-17 |
| Date resolved | 2023-02-22 |
| Court | Capital Markets Tribunal (Ontario) |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Aaron Wolfe |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Ontario Securities Act s.76 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- C$200k
What is alleged to have happened
The Ontario Securities Commission filed its statement of allegations against Aaron Wolfe on February 17, 2023 and the Capital Markets Tribunal approved a settlement on February 22, 2023 (file 2023-5).
Staff alleged, and Wolfe accepted in the settlement, that in November 2018 he traded in the shares of Tahoe Resources Inc., then a reporting issuer listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange, after learning from a third party of a proposed acquisition of the company that had not yet been announced.
The approved order carries an administrative penalty of C$200,000, disgorgement of C$125,064 and C$15,000 in costs, payable on a payment plan. The conduct is recorded against equities.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2023-02-17 Other
- 2023-02-17 Statement of Allegations
- 2023-02-22 Reasons and Decision
- 2023-02-22 Reasons and Decision
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |
| SEC v. Jamal (“Jimmy”) Chammout and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-17 | Insider Trading | $776k | filed |