Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (cftc-gabriel-perez-insider-trading-2026) by email

In August 2026 the CFTC settled charges against Gabriel Perez, a White House teleprompter operator who traded prediction-market event contracts on non-public information from his federal job. He must disgorge $107,539.02, pay a $65,000 penalty and accept a three-year trading ban.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 9289-26
Date filed 2026-08-28
Date resolved 2026-08-28
Status judgment
Criminal parallel No
Bars imposed trading ban
Defendants Gabriel Perez (individual)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$65k
Disgorgement
$108k
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$173k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced the order on August 28, 2026 as release 9289-26.

The order finds that between December 2025 and February 2026 Perez misappropriated material non-public information obtained through his government employment to trade event contracts on a prediction market platform for his own benefit.

He must disgorge profits of $107,539.02 and pay a $65,000 civil penalty, discounted for cooperation, and is barred from trading for three years. The earlier record showed only the penalty.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2026-08-28 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled
SEBI v. Suresh Venkatachari and others (insider trading, SecureKloud Technologies, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-07-31 Insider Trading — judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.