SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2026 the Securities and Exchange Commission filed settled charges against Benjamin Tesfaye of Texas, who allegedly traded Calliditas Therapeutics securities in his own and a relative's accounts ahead of the May 28, 2024 announcement of Asahi Kasei's tender offer, on information misappropriated from his romantic partner at an Asahi Kasei subsidiary, earning $18,668. He consented, subject to court approval, to an injunction, $18,668 in disgorgement, $2,168 in interest and an equal penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26609 |
| Date filed | 2026-08-11 |
| Date resolved | 2026-08-11 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | options |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Benjamin Tesfaye |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $18.7k
- Disgorgement
- $18.7k
- Prejudgment interest
- $2.2k
- Total relief
- $39.5k
- Alleged gain
- $18.7k
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 11, 2026 as release LR-26609, filing in the Northern District of Texas the same day.
His partner's role included assessing Calliditas's compliance program for the acquisition. Sections 10(b) and 14(e) and Rules 10b-5 and 14e-3 are charged.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2026-08-11 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEBI v. Suresh Venkatachari and others (insider trading, SecureKloud Technologies, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-07-31 | Insider Trading | — | judgment |