SEC v. William T. Walters, et al. (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In April 2018 a federal court approved settlements between the SEC and William Walters and Dean Foods director Thomas Davis in an insider trading case. Walters agreed to disgorge $19,004,429.26 plus interest, and Davis agreed to settle charges that he tipped Walters.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24125 |
| Date filed | 2018-04-30 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: convicted (William Walters (convicted); Thomas C. Davis pleaded guilty) |
| Defendants | William T. Walters, et al. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $19m
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $19m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the settlements on April 30, 2018 as litigation release 24125, in a case filed in May 2016.
The complaint alleges Davis, a Dean Foods board member who owed Walters money, regularly passed him inside information, using prepaid phones, in return for nearly $1 million in benefits, and that Walters made millions trading on it.
The record previously said the matter was dismissed; the court approved the settlements on April 17, 2018.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-04-30 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |