Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Andy Z. Fan (fake press releases, 2018)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-andy-z-fan-fake-press-releases-2018) by email

In 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Andy Z. Fan, alleging conduct this library classifies as fake press releases, matched orders and reverse merger schemes. The release records a civil penalty of $140,000.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 3-18451
Date filed 2018-04-25
Date resolved 2018-04-25
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Andy Z. Fan (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.13(a) ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(1) ; Securities Act s.17(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Fake press releases , Matched orders , Reverse merger schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$140k
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$140k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on April 25, 2018 as release 3-18451. The respondents named are Andy Z. Fan (1 individual, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as fake press releases, matched orders and reverse merger schemes, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $140,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2018-04-25 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Darren Ofsink and Michael T. Morris (CodeSmart, 2023) SEC 2023-04-03 Reverse Merger Schemes , Undisclosed Control Blocks +1 — judgment
SEC v. Michael J. Starkweather and Andiamo Corporation, William White (matched orders, 2019) SEC 2019-10-17 Matched Orders , Fake Press Releases $150k settled
SEBI v. Shreedhar Yellaiah Kodam (synchronized trades, Well Pack Papers, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-09-22 Matched Orders , Price Manipulation — dismissed
SEC v. Corey Ortiz (free riding and parking, 2026) SEC 2026-09-03 Free Riding And Parking , Matched Orders — judgment
SEBI v. Kalahridhaan Trendz Limited and others (false corporate announcements, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-07-30 Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Fake Press Releases — judgment
SEBI v. Hanif Shekh and others (price and volume manipulation in five scrips, Mauria Udyog and others, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-06-30 Matched Orders , Pump And Dump +1 — judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.