SEC v. Wellness Center USA, Inc. (fake press releases, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Wellness Center USA, Inc., alleging conduct this library classifies as fake press releases. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-18435 |
| Date filed | 2018-04-12 |
| Date resolved | 2018-04-12 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | OTC |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Wellness Center USA, Inc. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.15(a) ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Fake press releases |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on April 12, 2018 as release 3-18435. The respondents named are Wellness Center USA, Inc. (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as fake press releases, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities, with OTC identified in the release.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Fake press releases — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBI v. Kalahridhaan Trendz Limited and others (false corporate announcements, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-07-30 | Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Fake Press Releases | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Muhammad Saad Shoukat and others (fake press releases, 2026) | SEC | 2026-01-06 | Fake Press Releases , Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jeremy Koski (fake press releases, 2023) | SEC | 2023-09-01 | Fake Press Releases | $100k | settled |
| SEC v. In Ovations Holdings, Inc. and Mark Goldberg (fake press releases, 2022) | SEC | 2022-12-09 | Fake Press Releases | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Michael J. Starkweather and Andiamo Corporation (fake press releases, 2021) | SEC | 2021-12-03 | Fake Press Releases | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Mark A. Miller (fake press releases, 2021) | SEC | 2021-06-21 | Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump | — | judgment |