Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Jason W. Galanis (matched orders, 2015)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-jason-w-galanis-matched-orders-2015) by email

The SEC's September 2015 Gerova Financial Group case against Jason, John, Derek and Jared Galanis, Gary Hirst and Gavin Hamels ended in consent final judgments filed in August 2018 in the Southern District of New York, with the SEC saying all six had settled. The four Galanis judgments order $8,318,184 in disgorgement and $2,398,730.92 in interest; the Hirst and Hamels judgments read state no money. Jason Galanis was sentenced to 135 months in the parallel criminal case.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23360
Date filed 2015-09-24
Date resolved 2018-08-29
Status settled
Venue NYSE
Criminal parallel Yes: sentenced (Jason Galanis, lead defendant (others pleaded or were convicted; sentences vary)), U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
Sentence 11y 3m
Bars imposed officer-and-director bar
Defendants Jason W. Galanis (individual) ; John Galanis (individual) ; Derek Galanis (individual) ; Jared Galanis (individual) ; Gary Hirst (individual) ; Gavin Hamels (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Advisers Act s.206 ; Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.20(e) ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(1) ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Matched orders

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
$8.3m
Prejudgment interest
$2.4m
Total relief
$10.7m
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 24, 2015 as release LR-23360. The respondents named are Jason W. Galanis, John Galanis, Derek Galanis, Jared Galanis, Gary Hirst and Gavin Hamels (6 individuals, 0 entities).

The complaint alleges that in early 2010 Jason Galanis and Gary Hirst arranged for shares to be issued to a Kosovo friend of the family, that the Galanises directed the sales and received proceeds of about $20 million, and that Galanis bribed adviser Gavin Hamels to buy Gerova stock for clients, with many purchases coordinated as matched trades against the friend's sales.

This library tags the matter as matched orders, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

Nothing in the complaint has been proven. A parallel criminal case was brought.

Consent final judgments for the four Galanis defendants and Hamels were filed on 9 August 2018 and Hirst's on 29 August 2018, and the SEC's release of 21 September 2018 states that it had settled with all six. Jason Galanis was ordered to pay $7,483,684 in disgorgement and $2,178,510.87 in interest, John Galanis $604,000 and $175,825.27, Derek Galanis $23,000 and $6,695.32 and Jared Galanis $207,500 and $37,699.46, with installment terms for Jared; the stored totals add these four. The judgments I read for Hirst and Hamels contain injunctions, and for Hirst an officer and director bar, but no dollar figures. Each defendant had pleaded guilty or, in Hirst's case, been convicted in the parallel criminal case; Jason Galanis was sentenced to 135 months, the longest sentence listed. The consents were without admission of the SEC's allegations, but the criminal outcomes are separate findings.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary documents linked above. This page summarises the structured record and does not reproduce them.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-09-24 Litigation release published
  2. 2018-08-29 Last of the consent final judgments filed (Hirst); SEC reports all six defendants settled (S.D.N.Y.)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2015-09-24 SEC SEC v. Jason W. Galanis (matched orders, 2015)(this record) Settled
2016-09-30 SEC SEC v. Jason W. Galanis, et al. (matched orders, 2016) Settled

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEBI v. Shreedhar Yellaiah Kodam (synchronized trades, Well Pack Papers, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-09-22 Matched Orders , Price Manipulation — dismissed
SEC v. Corey Ortiz (free riding and parking, 2026) SEC 2026-09-03 Free Riding And Parking , Matched Orders — judgment
SEBI v. Hanif Shekh and others (price and volume manipulation in five scrips, Mauria Udyog and others, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-06-30 Matched Orders , Pump And Dump +1 — judgment
SEC v. Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd and Travis Treusch (free riding and parking, 2026) SEC 2026-04-30 Free Riding And Parking , Matched Orders — judgment
SEBI v. Harsha Ishvarbhai Solanki and others (trading in ANI Integrated Services, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-02-12 Price Manipulation , Matched Orders — judgment
SEBI adjudication orders on illiquid stock options at BSE (2026 batch) SEBI (India) 2026-01-05 Matched Orders — judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.