Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd and Travis Treusch (free riding and parking, 2026)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-christopher-flagg-free-riding-and-parking-2026) by email

In April 2026 the SEC announced final consent judgments against Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd and Travis Treusch in the Long Island free-riding case. Together they are liable for $482,440 disgorgement and $47,654.75 interest, deemed satisfied by criminal restitution, with conduct injunctions of five years for Flagg and Lloyd and three for Treusch.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-26545
Date filed 2026-04-30
Date resolved 2026-04-30
Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
Status judgment
Criminal parallel Yes: criminal case referred to, outcome not stated in the document (Flagg, Lloyd and Treusch (criminal restitution and forfeiture orders are referred to; no plea or sentence stated)), E.D.N.Y.
Bars imposed conduct-based injunction
Defendants Christopher Flagg (individual) ; Daquan Lloyd (individual) ; Travis Treusch (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Free riding and parking , Matched orders

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
$482k
Prejudgment interest
$47.7k
Total relief
$530k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on April 30, 2026 (litigation release 26545) that on April 27, 2026 the Eastern District of New York entered final consent judgments against Flagg, Lloyd and Treusch.

The complaints alleged an approximately $2 million scheme in which unfunded loser accounts at a broker giving instant deposit credit traded at artificial prices with winner accounts the defendants controlled, using at least 600 accounts over four years. Flagg was charged as a principal; Lloyd and Treusch with aiding and abetting by opening loser accounts and recruiting others. Partial judgments had been entered in 2024 and 2025.

The final judgments set disgorgement and interest, each deemed satisfied by criminal restitution and forfeiture: Flagg $56,390 and $5,570; Lloyd $376,050 and $37,145.75; Treusch $50,000 and $4,939, with the earlier injunctions continuing for five years for Flagg and Lloyd and three for Treusch. The record showed only Flagg's disgorgement. This library tags the matter as free riding and matched orders.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2026-04-30 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 4 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2024-04-04 SEC SEC v. Eduardo Hernandez, Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd and Corey Ortiz (free riding and parking, 2024) Settled
2025-07-03 SEC SEC v. Eduardo Hernandez (free riding and parking, 2025) Judgment entered
2026-04-30 SEC SEC v. Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd and Travis Treusch (free riding and parking, 2026)(this record) Judgment entered
2026-09-03 SEC SEC v. Corey Ortiz (free riding and parking, 2026) Judgment entered

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Corey Ortiz (free riding and parking, 2026) SEC 2026-09-03 Free Riding And Parking , Matched Orders — judgment
SEC v. Eduardo Hernandez (free riding and parking, 2025) SEC 2025-07-03 Free Riding And Parking , Matched Orders — judgment
SEC v. Eduardo Hernandez, Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd and Corey Ortiz (free riding and parking, 2024) SEC 2024-04-04 Free Riding And Parking , Matched Orders — settled
SEBI v. Shreedhar Yellaiah Kodam (synchronized trades, Well Pack Papers, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-09-22 Matched Orders , Price Manipulation — dismissed
SEC v. Mayur Baviskar (free riding and parking, 2026) SEC 2026-08-26 Free Riding And Parking $50k settled
SEBI v. Hanif Shekh and others (price and volume manipulation in five scrips, Mauria Udyog and others, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-06-30 Matched Orders , Pump And Dump +1 — judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.