Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Daniel P. McKelvey, Alvin S. Mirman, Steven Sanders and others (blank check shells, 2015)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-daniel-p-mckelvey-et-al-reverse-merger-schemes-2015) by email

In April 2015 the SEC charged ten individuals over a scheme that created nearly two dozen undisclosed blank check companies and sold most of them for about $6 million for use in reverse mergers. In the Southern District of Florida, final judgments against the six court defendants were in place by February 23, 2018, with some money claims dropped after parallel criminal forfeiture and sentencing. The four figureheads who settled in administrative orders were not checked.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23243
Date filed 2015-04-16
Date resolved 2018-02-23
Court U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida
Status judgment
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel Yes: sentenced (Alvin Mirman and Steven Sanders (forfeiture ordered at sentencing; the document gives no prison term); the other defendants are not covered), U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, 2017-02-15
Bars imposed officer-and-director bar, penny stock bar
Defendants Daniel P. McKelvey (individual) ; Alvin S. Mirman (individual) ; Steven Sanders (individual) ; Edward G. Sanders (individual) ; Scott F. Hughes (individual) ; Jeffrey L. Lamson (individual) ; Edward T. Farmer (individual) ; William J. Gaffney (individual) ; Kevin D. Miller (individual) ; Ronald A. Warren (individual)
Techniques Reverse merger schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
$6m

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on April 16, 2015 as release LR-23243. The respondents named are Daniel P. McKelvey, Alvin S. Mirman, Steven Sanders, Edward G. Sanders, Scott F. Hughes, Jeffrey L. Lamson, Edward T. Farmer, William J. Gaffney, Kevin D. Miller and Ronald A. Warren (10 individuals, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida.

The complaint alleges that the three principals evaded blank-check-company requirements by installing figurehead officers and filing false business plans, and forged certifications and other documents. The release calls such shells attractive for pump-and-dump schemes but does not charge a pump-and-dump. Four figureheads (Farmer, Gaffney, Miller and Warren) consented to bars and disgorgement. This library tags the matter as reverse merger schemes.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

Non-monetary relief recorded: officer-and-director bar, penny stock bar.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

Outcome for the six defendants sued in the Southern District of Florida (McKelvey, Mirman, Steven Sanders, Edward Sanders, Hughes, Lamson). Permanent injunctions were entered in 2015 and 2016. The last final judgments, entered on February 23, 2018, covered McKelvey, Edward Sanders, Hughes and Lamson: McKelvey was barred from serving as an officer or director of a public company; Hughes was ordered to pay $10,000 in disgorgement, $1,506.02 in interest and a $150,000 penalty; Lamson was ordered to pay $74,104 in disgorgement plus interest; and Edward Sanders was ordered to pay $5,000 in disgorgement plus $268.22 in interest and a penalty whose figure is illegible in the scanned copy. The SEC dropped its disgorgement and penalty claims against Mirman and Steven Sanders on October 6, 2017, citing the parallel criminal case in which Mirman was sentenced to twelve months in prison and ordered to forfeit $2,409,806. Because of the illegible figure and the dropped claims, no combined money total is recorded here. The four figureheads (Farmer, Gaffney, Miller, Warren) who settled in separate administrative proceedings were not checked, and Daniel McKelvey's later administrative proceeding was not read.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-04-16 Litigation release published
  2. 2017-10-06 SEC drops disgorgement and penalty claims against Mirman and Steven Sanders after parallel criminal sentencing
  3. 2018-02-23 Final judgments entered against McKelvey, Edward Sanders, Hughes and Lamson

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Brian Quinn and David Skriloff (Environmental Packaging, 2024) SEC 2024-10-18 Reverse Merger Schemes , Undisclosed Control Blocks $461k judgment
SEC v. Meta Materials, Inc. ( and others (engineered short squeeze, 2024) SEC 2024-06-25 Engineered Short Squeeze , Reverse Merger Schemes $1m settled
SEC v. Darren Ofsink and Michael T. Morris (CodeSmart, 2023) SEC 2023-04-03 Reverse Merger Schemes , Undisclosed Control Blocks +1 — judgment
SEC v. James T. Patten, Peter L. Coker Sr. and Peter L. Coker Jr. (reverse merger schemes, 2022) SEC 2022-09-27 Reverse Merger Schemes , Price Manipulation — filed
SEC v. Charles Parkinson Lloyd (reverse merger schemes, 2021) SEC 2021-09-15 Reverse Merger Schemes , Unregistered Distributions $40k settled
SEC v. Simon Piers Thurlow, Roger Fidler and others (reverse merger schemes, 2021) SEC 2021-09-15 Reverse Merger Schemes — filed

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.