SEC v. James T. Patten, Peter L. Coker Sr. and Peter L. Coker Jr. (reverse merger schemes, 2022)
Alleged — pending
These are allegations. SEC has filed an action; nothing in it has been proven, and the respondents have not been found liable. Everything described on this page is what the regulator alleges, not what a court has found. See our editorial policy.
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In September 2022 the SEC sued James Patten and Peter Coker Sr. and Jr. in New Jersey, alleging they took control of the shares of Hometown International, a deli with under $40,000 of revenue, and shell E-Waste Corp., inflated prices by manipulative trading and used reverse mergers to plan to dump their shares. Criminal charges were announced in parallel. These are allegations.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25526 |
| Date filed | 2022-09-27 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey |
| Status | filed |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: charged (James T. Patten, Peter L. Coker Sr. and Peter L. Coker Jr.) |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar, penny stock bar |
| Defendants | James T. Patten ; Peter L. Coker Sr. ; Peter L. Coker Jr. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(1) ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Reverse merger schemes , Price manipulation |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced on September 27, 2022 (litigation release 25526) a complaint filed on September 26, 2022 in the District of New Jersey.
The SEC alleges the three took control of the outstanding shares of Hometown International and E-Waste Corp., lifted Hometown's price from about $1 in October 2019 to nearly $14 by April 2021, a market value near $100 million, through manipulative trading, and used both companies to acquire private businesses in reverse mergers with the intent to sell their shares at inflated prices. News coverage of the inflated prices appeared before they could profit. All three are charged under Section 17(a)(1) and (3), Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5(a) and (c); Patten under Section 9(a)(1), with the Cokers accused of aiding and abetting. The SEC seeks injunctions, disgorgement, penalties and penny-stock bars, and an officer-director bar against Coker Jr. The U.S. Attorney's Office announced parallel criminal charges. These are allegations in a pending case.
This library tags the matter as reverse merger schemes and price manipulation. The record's defendant field held only "James T. Patten, et al."
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Reverse merger schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2022-09-27 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBI v. Shreedhar Yellaiah Kodam (synchronized trades, Well Pack Papers, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-09-22 | Matched Orders , Price Manipulation | — | dismissed |
| SEBI v. Debock Industries Limited and others (fictitious issues, inflated sales and diverted rights-issue funds, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-28 | Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Price Manipulation | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Varanium Cloud Limited and others (false accounts, diverted IPO funds and share sales, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-25 | Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Price Manipulation | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Abhay Dwivedi and others (YouTube promotion, Decillion Finance, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-03 | Social Media Ramps , Price Manipulation | — | judgment |
| CFTC v. George Santos (price manipulation, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-31 | Price Manipulation | $17.5k | settled |
| SEBI v. Amesh Surajlal Jaiswal and others (Telegram tips, Akash Infra-Projects, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-07-28 | Social Media Ramps , Price Manipulation | — | judgment |