SEC v. Cort Poyner et al. (price manipulation, 2017)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission published a release reporting the entry of final judgments against two stock promoters charged with a broker-bribery scheme to manipulate two microcap stocks. This library classifies the conduct as price manipulation.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-23722 |
| Date filed | 2017-01-19 |
| Date resolved | 2017-01-19 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | penny stock bar |
| Defendants | Cort Poyner et al. |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Price manipulation |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on January 19, 2017 as release LR-23722. The respondents named are Cort Poyner et al. (1 individual, 0 entities).
The release reports final judgments against two stock promoters in an action alleging a broker-bribery scheme to manipulate the stock of two microcap companies. The injunctions are for Section 17(a), Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, with penny stock bars. No promotion for undisclosed payment is alleged, so the paid-promotion tag has been replaced with price manipulation.
This library tags the matter as price manipulation, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
Non-monetary relief recorded: penny stock bar.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2017-01-19 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTC v. George Santos (price manipulation, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-31 | Price Manipulation | $17.5k | settled |
| Victorian man sentenced in market manipulation case (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-12-12 | Price Manipulation , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| ASIC v. Delta Power & Energy (Vales Point) Pty Ltd (price manipulation, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-06-30 | Price Manipulation , Marking The Close | — | filed |
| Victorian man charged over alleged market manipulation (ASIC, 2025) | ASIC | 2025-03-14 | Price Manipulation , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Marco Babini, et al. (price manipulation, 2024) | SEC | 2024-09-27 | Price Manipulation | — | judgment |
| CFTC v. TOTSA TotalEnergies Trading SA (price manipulation, 2024) | CFTC | 2024-08-27 | Price Manipulation | $48m | settled |