CFTC v. TOTSA TotalEnergies Trading SA (price manipulation, 2024)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2024 the CFTC issued an order settling charges against TOTSA TotalEnergies Trading SA for attempting in March 2018 to depress the Argus EBOB benchmark by selling physical gasoline below buyers' bids while holding a large short in EBOB-linked futures. TOTSA pays a $48 million civil penalty.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 8953-24 |
| Date filed | 2024-08-27 |
| Date resolved | 2024-08-27 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | futures |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | TOTSA TotalEnergies Trading SA |
| Cited as charged or alleged | CEA s.6(c)(1) and Regulation 180.1 |
| Techniques | Price manipulation |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $48m
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $48m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on August 27, 2024 as release 8953-24. The respondent named is TOTSA TotalEnergies Trading SA (0 individuals, 1 entity).
The order finds TOTSA's sales exceeded 60 percent of brokered volume that month and were reported into the Argus benchmark, to benefit its short futures position. This library tags the matter as price manipulation.
The conduct is recorded against futures.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $48 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2024-08-27 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBI v. Shreedhar Yellaiah Kodam (synchronized trades, Well Pack Papers, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-09-22 | Matched Orders , Price Manipulation | — | dismissed |
| SEBI v. Debock Industries Limited and others (fictitious issues, inflated sales and diverted rights-issue funds, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-28 | Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Price Manipulation | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Varanium Cloud Limited and others (false accounts, diverted IPO funds and share sales, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-25 | Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Price Manipulation | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Abhay Dwivedi and others (YouTube promotion, Decillion Finance, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-03 | Social Media Ramps , Price Manipulation | — | judgment |
| CFTC v. George Santos (price manipulation, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-31 | Price Manipulation | $17.5k | settled |
| SEBI v. Amesh Surajlal Jaiswal and others (Telegram tips, Akash Infra-Projects, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-07-28 | Social Media Ramps , Price Manipulation | — | judgment |