SEC v. Brian Weber and Bebida Beverage Co. (fake press releases, 2018)
Judgment entered
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission obtained a judgment against Brian Weber and Bebida Beverage Co., alleging conduct this library classifies as fake press releases and paid stock promotion. The release records disgorgement of $208,000, prejudgment interest of $23,436.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24329 |
| Date filed | 2018-10-31 |
| Date resolved | 2018-10-31 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar, penny stock bar |
| Defendants | Brian Weber ; Bebida Beverage Co. |
| Techniques | Fake press releases , Paid stock promotion |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $208k
- Prejudgment interest
- $23.4k
- Total relief
- $231k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on October 31, 2018 as release LR-24329. The respondents named are Brian Weber and Bebida Beverage Co. (1 individual, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as fake press releases and paid stock promotion, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
The relief recorded in our data is disgorgement of $208,000, prejudgment interest of $23,436. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
Non-monetary relief recorded: officer-and-director bar, penny stock bar.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Fake press releases — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Paid stock promotion — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-10-31 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. In Ovations Holdings, Inc. and Mark Goldberg (fake press releases, 2022) | SEC | 2022-12-09 | Fake Press Releases , Paid Stock Promotion | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Michael J. Starkweather and Andiamo Corporation (fake press releases, 2021) | SEC | 2021-12-03 | Fake Press Releases , Paid Stock Promotion | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Wellness Center USA, Inc. (fake press releases, 2018) | SEC | 2018-04-12 | Fake Press Releases , Paid Stock Promotion | — | settled |
| SEC v. Andalusian Resorts and others (fake press releases, 2017) | SEC | 2017-10-30 | Fake Press Releases , Paid Stock Promotion +2 | — | filed |
| SEC v. Joshua A. Weiss (paid stock promotion, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-10 | Paid Stock Promotion | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Stephen J. Czarnik (paid stock promotion, 2026) | SEC | 2026-06-29 | Paid Stock Promotion , Unregistered Distributions | — | judgment |