SEBI v. Kavi Arora (fund diversion at Religare Finvest, 2023, 2023)

Judgment entered

✓ Checked against the primary document on October 8, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the order; an independent second reading of 60 SEBI records agreed on every field for 56, the four misses being penalty amounts. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sebi-69097-misleading-issuer-disclosure-2023) by email

In March 2023 a SEBI whole-time member found that Kavi Arora, managing director and chief executive of Religare Finvest, took part in a scheme that diverted funds from the lender to entities tied to the group's former promoters. He was restrained from the market for two years and penalised Rs 5 crore.

The record

What was ordered

Civil penalty

—

Disgorgement

—

Prejudgment interest

—

Total relief

—

Alleged gain

—

Penalty as published

50m INR

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in INR. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

Religare Enterprises Ltd (REL) is a listed financial services group and Religare Finvest Ltd (RFL) is its lending subsidiary. SEBI's case began with an interim order of March 2019 against the two companies, a long list of borrower entities and the group's former promoters, Malvinder and Shivinder Mohan Singh, directing that loans of about Rs 2,315 crore be recalled. After investigation, SEBI served a show cause notice in November 2020 on 13 parties.

Most of the other noticees were dealt with separately. REL and RFL settled for Rs 10,50,75,000 in a May 2022 order, and a final order of July 2022 covered ten others. Mr Arora's case was held back because of litigation over the documents SEBI could rely on, which went to the High Court and the Supreme Court, and his own settlement application was rejected in October 2021. This order is the last in the sequence.

SEBI's case against Mr Arora, who was RFL's managing director and chief executive, was that between 2014-15 and 2017-18 the lender's corporate loan book was used to channel money to entities connected to the promoters despite adverse comments from the Reserve Bank of India, a rating agency and lending banks. The order puts diversion through that loan book at about Rs 2,473.66 crore. The whole-time member held that Mr Arora was involved knee deep in the scheme, that his stated concerns were superficial or meant to protect himself, and that he gave consent to fresh loans and to evergreening of existing ones.

The order restrains Mr Arora for two years from the securities market and from serving as a director or key manager of a listed company, a registered intermediary or a market infrastructure institution, and imposes a Rs 5 crore penalty under section 15HA, payable within 45 days. No disgorgement was ordered.

The record does not show appeals, payment or the outcome of any other agency's proceedings in the Religare matter. It describes no criminal case. The findings are SEBI's own conclusions from its investigation and the contested documents.

This library tags the matter as misleading issuer disclosure. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the order.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

• Misleading issuer disclosure — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.

Timeline

1. 2023-03-16 SEBI final order

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

• SEBI order

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Related actions

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Record added October 8, 2026. submit a correction.