SEBI v. P.V.R. Murthy (Birla Cotsyn GDR issue, 2023)

Judgment entered

✓ Checked against the primary document on October 9, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the order; an independent second reading of 60 SEBI records agreed on every field for 56, the four misses being penalty amounts; a later sample of 50 of the SEBI records added on 9 October agreed on every field for 46. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sebi-67653-market-abuse-2023) by email

In January 2023 a SEBI adjudicating officer fined a former Birla Cotsyn director Rs 10 lakh for signing the pledge that let the company's own GDR proceeds secure the loan used to buy its USD 24.99 million GDR issue. The order treats the issue as a self-financed, and so fraudulent, scheme.

The record

What was ordered

Civil penalty

—

Disgorgement

—

Prejudgment interest

—

Total relief

—

Alleged gain

—

Penalty as published

1m INR

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in INR. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

The order of 31 January 2023 was made by SEBI adjudicating officer G. Ramar. The sole noticee is P.V.R. Murthy, a director and authorised signatory of Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd, a company listed on BSE and NSE. An earlier SEBI order of 25 May 2022 had fined him Rs 20 lakh, but the Securities Appellate Tribunal set that order aside on 22 November 2022 and sent the matter back to SEBI for a fresh decision, in which he filed written submissions.

SEBI investigated February to April 2010. It found that the company issued 9.69 million global depositary receipts, worth USD 24.99 million, on 15 March 2010, and that a single buyer, Vintage FZE, took the whole issue with money borrowed from a European bank under a loan agreement of 23 February 2010. On the same day the company signed a pledge agreement, executed by Mr Murthy, that put the GDR proceeds up as collateral for that loan. SEBI alleged this meant the issue could not have been subscribed without the company's own security, the money was never freely available to the company, and investors were given a false picture of a genuinely subscribed issue. The charge was fraud under section 12A of the SEBI Act and PFUTP Regulations 3 and 4(1).

Mr Murthy argued that about 12 years had passed and that delay had impaired his defence. The adjudicating officer held the charge established, finding that as director, a participant in the board decision and the signatory he had played a central part in a scheme the public and investors did not know about. The order notes that gain and investor loss were not quantifiable and that he had a similar role in other GDR issues.

The penalty was Rs 10,00,000 under section 15HA, half the amount fixed in the order the tribunal set aside.

The record does not show whether the new order was appealed, how the GDR proceeds were ultimately dealt with, or any criminal case.

This library tags the matter as misleading issuer disclosure, because the order treats the issuer's concealed self-financing of its GDR issue as a deception of investors. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the order.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

• Misleading issuer disclosure — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.

Timeline

1. 2023-01-31 SEBI order

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

• SEBI order
• SEBI order (PDF)

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Related actions

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Record added October 8, 2026. submit a correction.