OSC v. Ming Chao Zhao (insider trading, 2013)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2013 the Ontario Securities Commission approved a settlement with Ming Chao Zhao, a BMO Nesbitt Burns investment banking analyst who admitted trading, through a relative's account, ahead of announcements of mergers involving five reporting issuers between 2010 and 2011. He agreed to a C$750,000 penalty, disgorgement of C$416,719 and permanent registrant bans.
The record
| Agency | OSC |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2013-05-02 |
| Date resolved | 2013-05-17 |
| Court | Capital Markets Tribunal (Ontario) |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Ming Chao Zhao |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Ontario Securities Act s.76 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- C$750k
What is alleged to have happened
The Ontario Securities Commission issued its statement of allegations on May 2, 2013 and approved the settlement on May 17, 2013.
The agreed facts are that Zhao, while an analyst at BMO, held undisclosed information about merger and acquisition deals involving Menu Foods, Consolidated Thompson Iron Mines, Forzani Group, Pacific Northern Gas and Canmarc REIT, and directed purchases of their securities in a TD Waterhouse discount brokerage account held by a family member.
The order carries a C$750,000 administrative penalty, disgorgement of C$416,719 and permanent bans on acting as a registrant, investment fund manager or promoter.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2013-04-30 Settlement Agreement
- 2013-05-02 Notice of Hearing
- 2013-05-02 Statement of Allegations
- 2013-05-17 Reasons and Decision
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
- Tribunal proceeding
- Settlement Agreement
- Notice of Hearing
- Statement of Allegations
- Reasons and Decision
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |
| SEC v. Jamal (“Jimmy”) Chammout and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-17 | Insider Trading | $776k | filed |