Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Deutsche Bank AG (LIBOR and Euribor manipulation, 2015)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (cftc-of-manipulation-benchmark-submission-rigging-2015) by email

In April 2015 the CFTC issued an order settling charges against Deutsche Bank AG for false reporting, attempted manipulation and at times successful manipulation of U.S. dollar, yen, sterling and Swiss franc LIBOR and Euribor, imposing an $800 million penalty, the largest in CFTC history to that date, alongside related Justice Department actions.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 7159-15
Date filed 2015-04-23
Date resolved 2015-04-23
Status settled
Asset class fx
Criminal parallel Yes: charged (DB Group Services UK Limited (agreed to plead guilty to wire fraud) and Deutsche Bank AG (deferred prosecution agreement))
Defendants Deutsche Bank AG (entity)
Also named elsewhere Deutsche Bank AG is named in 1 other matter
Techniques Benchmark submission rigging , FX fixing , Price manipulation

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$800m
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$800m
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on April 24, 2015 as release 7159-15. The respondent named is Deutsche Bank AG (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging, fx fixing and price manipulation, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against fx.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $800 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-04-23 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2015-04-23 CFTC CFTC v. Deutsche Bank AG (LIBOR and Euribor manipulation, 2015)(this record) Settled
2015-04-23 FCA FCA v. Deutsche Bank AG (benchmark submission rigging, 2015) Settled

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
CFTC v. Barclays Bank PLC (FX benchmark manipulation, 2015) CFTC 2015-05-20 Benchmark Submission Rigging , FX Fixing +1 $400m settled
CFTC v. Citibank, HSBC, JPMorgan, RBS and UBS (FX benchmark manipulation, 2014) CFTC 2014-11-12 Benchmark Submission Rigging , FX Fixing +1 $1.5bn settled
CFTC v. Bank of America (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-19 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $30m judgment
CFTC v. ICAP Capital Markets LLC (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-18 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $50m judgment
CFTC v. BNP Paribas (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-08-29 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $90m judgment
CFTC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-06-18 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $65m judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.