Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Bank of America (benchmark submission rigging, 2018)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (cftc-bank-of-america-benchmark-submission-rigging-2018) by email

In 2018, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Bank of America, alleging conduct this library classifies as benchmark submission rigging and price manipulation. The release records a civil penalty of $30 million.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 7794-18
Date filed 2018-09-19
Date resolved 2018-09-19
Status judgment
Asset class futures
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Bank of America, N.A. (entity)
Techniques Benchmark submission rigging , Price manipulation

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$30m
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$30m
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on September 19, 2018 as release 7794-18. The respondent named is Bank of America, N.A. (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging and price manipulation, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against futures.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $30 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2018-09-19 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
CFTC v. ICAP Capital Markets LLC (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-18 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $50m judgment
CFTC v. BNP Paribas (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-08-29 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $90m judgment
CFTC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-06-18 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $65m judgment
CFTC v. Société Générale S.A. (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-06-04 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $475m judgment
CFTC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-02-01 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $70m judgment
CFTC v. The Royal Bank of Scotland (benchmark submission rigging, 2017) CFTC 2017-02-03 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $85m judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.