CFTC v. Barclays Bank PLC (FX benchmark manipulation, 2015)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In May 2015 the CFTC issued an order settling charges against Barclays Bank PLC for attempted manipulation and false reporting of global FX benchmark rates, and for aiding other banks' attempts, imposing a $400 million penalty. The same day it took a separate ISDAFIX action against Barclays, recorded separately.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 7181-15 |
| Date filed | 2015-05-20 |
| Date resolved | 2015-05-20 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | futures, fx |
| Venue | CME |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Barclays Bank PLC |
| Also named elsewhere | Barclays Bank PLC |
| Techniques | Benchmark submission rigging , FX fixing , Price manipulation |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $400m
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $400m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on May 21, 2015 as release 7181-15. The respondent named is Barclays Bank PLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging, fx fixing and price manipulation, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against futures and fx, with CME identified in the release.
The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $400 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Benchmark submission rigging — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- FX fixing — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2015-05-20 CFTC release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015-05-20 | CFTC | CFTC v. Barclays Bank PLC (FX benchmark manipulation, 2015) | Settled |
| 2015-05-20 | FCA | FCA v. Barclays Bank PLC (FX benchmark manipulation, 2015) | Settled |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTC v. Deutsche Bank AG (LIBOR and Euribor manipulation, 2015) | CFTC | 2015-04-23 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , FX Fixing +1 | $800m | settled |
| CFTC v. Citibank, HSBC, JPMorgan, RBS and UBS (FX benchmark manipulation, 2014) | CFTC | 2014-11-12 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , FX Fixing +1 | $1.5bn | settled |
| CFTC v. Bank of America (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-19 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $30m | judgment |
| CFTC v. ICAP Capital Markets LLC (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-18 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $50m | judgment |
| CFTC v. BNP Paribas (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-08-29 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $90m | judgment |
| CFTC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-06-18 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $65m | judgment |