Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Barclays Bank PLC (FX benchmark manipulation, 2015)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (cftc-of-attempted-manipulation-benchmark-submission-rigging-2015) by email

In May 2015 the CFTC issued an order settling charges against Barclays Bank PLC for attempted manipulation and false reporting of global FX benchmark rates, and for aiding other banks' attempts, imposing a $400 million penalty. The same day it took a separate ISDAFIX action against Barclays, recorded separately.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 7181-15
Date filed 2015-05-20
Date resolved 2015-05-20
Status settled
Asset class futures, fx
Venue CME
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Barclays Bank PLC (entity)
Also named elsewhere Barclays Bank PLC is named in 1 other matter
Techniques Benchmark submission rigging , FX fixing , Price manipulation

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$400m
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$400m
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on May 21, 2015 as release 7181-15. The respondent named is Barclays Bank PLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging, fx fixing and price manipulation, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against futures and fx, with CME identified in the release.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $400 million. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-05-20 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Same matter

The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.

Date filed Agency Record Status
2015-05-20 CFTC CFTC v. Barclays Bank PLC (FX benchmark manipulation, 2015)(this record) Settled
2015-05-20 FCA FCA v. Barclays Bank PLC (FX benchmark manipulation, 2015) Settled

This grouping is the library's, made by matching names, techniques, dates and citations when the site is built. It is not the regulator's or a court's determination that the records are one case, and it errs towards missing a link rather than making a false one.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
CFTC v. Deutsche Bank AG (LIBOR and Euribor manipulation, 2015) CFTC 2015-04-23 Benchmark Submission Rigging , FX Fixing +1 $800m settled
CFTC v. Citibank, HSBC, JPMorgan, RBS and UBS (FX benchmark manipulation, 2014) CFTC 2014-11-12 Benchmark Submission Rigging , FX Fixing +1 $1.5bn settled
CFTC v. Bank of America (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-19 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $30m judgment
CFTC v. ICAP Capital Markets LLC (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-18 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $50m judgment
CFTC v. BNP Paribas (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-08-29 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $90m judgment
CFTC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) CFTC 2018-06-18 Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation $65m judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.