Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Tradition Securities and Derivatives, LLC (naked short selling debate, 2021)

Settled

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Tradition Securities and Derivatives, LLC, alleging conduct this library classifies as naked short selling debate. The release records disgorgement of $841,627, prejudgment interest of $104,205.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number 34-93154
Date filed 2021-09-28
Date resolved 2021-09-28
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Tradition Securities and Derivatives, LLC (entity)
Techniques The naked short selling debate

What was ordered

Civil penalty
Disgorgement
$842k
Prejudgment interest
$104k
Total relief
$946k
Alleged gain
$842k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 28, 2021 as release 34-93154. The respondents named are Tradition Securities and Derivatives, LLC (0 individuals, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as naked short selling debate, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

The relief recorded in our data is disgorgement of $841,627, prejudgment interest of $104,205. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2021-09-28 Administrative proceeding instituted (cease-and-desist)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Robinhood Financial LLC and Robinhood Securities, LLC (naked short selling debate, 2025) SEC 2025-01-13 Naked Short Selling Debate , Spoofing settled
SEC v. Maxim Group, LLC (naked short selling debate, 2023) SEC 2023-09-29 Naked Short Selling Debate settled
SEC v. Citadel Securities, LLC (naked short selling debate, 2023) SEC 2023-09-22 Naked Short Selling Debate settled
SEC v. Simplex Trading, LLC (naked short selling debate, 2023) SEC 2023-09-11 Naked Short Selling Debate settled
SEC v. Hal D. Mintz and Sabby Management LLC (naked short selling debate, 2023) SEC 2023-06-14 Naked Short Selling Debate filed
SEC v. IMC Chicago, LLC (naked short selling debate, 2022) SEC 2022-08-12 Naked Short Selling Debate settled

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.