SEC v. Terren S. Peizer and Acuitas Group Holdings, LLC (insider trading, 2023)
Dismissed
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In March 2023 the SEC charged Terren Peizer, then executive chairman of Ontrak, and his firm Acuitas Group Holdings with insider trading through Rule 10b5-1 plans. On August 7, 2026 the SEC and the defendants jointly stipulated to dismiss the civil action with prejudice. No monetary relief was imposed.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25658 |
| Date filed | 2023-03-08 |
| Date resolved | 2026-08-07 |
| Status | dismissed |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: charged (Terren S. Peizer), 2023-03-08 |
| Bars imposed | officer-and-director bar |
| Defendants | Terren S. Peizer ; Acuitas Group Holdings, LLC |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on March 8, 2023 as release LR-25658. The respondents named are Terren S. Peizer and Acuitas Group Holdings, LLC (1 individual, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as insider trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
The release references a parallel criminal proceeding. Where a criminal case exists, the civil and criminal outcomes are recorded separately, because they resolve on different standards of proof.
On August 7, 2026 the SEC filed a joint stipulation with Peizer and Acuitas Group Holdings to dismiss its civil case with prejudice, announced in release LR-26603. The stipulation says the Commission sought dismissal in the exercise of its discretion and that this does not necessarily reflect its position on any other case. The release does not give reasons beyond that, and it does not describe the outcome of the parallel criminal case, which this record does not cover.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2023-03-08 Litigation release published
- 2026-08-07 SEC and defendants stipulate to dismissal of the civil action with prejudice
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |