SEC v. Spark Trading Group LLC and Niket Shah (ponzi schemes, 2018)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In March 2018 the SEC announced charges, a preliminary injunction and an asset freeze in Brooklyn against Niket Shah and Spark Trading Group LLC over a Ponzi scheme that took more than $250,000 from friends and coworkers. After summary judgment for the SEC, a final judgment entered December 20, 2018 ordered $299,229 in disgorgement, $24,742 in interest and a $370,944 penalty against Shah.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24080 |
| Date filed | 2018-03-12 |
| Date resolved | 2018-12-20 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Spark Trading Group LLC ; Niket Shah |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $371k
- Disgorgement
- $299k
- Prejudgment interest
- $24.7k
- Total relief
- $695k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The complaint, filed March 12, 2018 and unsealed on March 22, alleged Shah misled more than 15 investors about his trading success, altered statements to hide losses, promised monthly returns guaranteed against loss, took money for himself, and told investors who wanted their money back that it had been frozen by government agencies.
Outcome: SEC release LR-24393 (February 8, 2019) says the Eastern District of New York granted summary judgment to the SEC, finding that Shah and Spark Trading falsely claimed registration, profitability and guaranteed funds, and entered a final judgment on December 20, 2018. It enjoins both from antifraud violations, holds them jointly and severally liable for $299,229 in disgorgement plus $24,742 in interest, and orders Shah to pay a $370,944 penalty. This was a court finding after contested summary judgment rather than a settlement. The release does not say how much was collected.
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the original document describes payments to earlier participants made from later participants' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-03-23 Litigation release published
- 2018-12-20 Final judgment entered against Shah and Spark Trading after summary judgment
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-03-12 | SEC | SEC v. Spark Trading Group LLC and Niket Shah (ponzi schemes, 2018) | Judgment entered |
| 2019-02-08 | SEC | SEC v. Spark Trading Group, LLC and Niket Shah (ponzi schemes, 2019) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |