SEC v. SeeThruEquity, LLC et al. (newsletter scalping, 2018)
Alleged — pending
These are allegations. SEC has filed an action; nothing in it has been proven, and the respondents have not been found liable. Everything described on this page is what the regulator alleges, not what a court has found. See our editorial policy.
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action against SeeThruEquity, LLC et al., alleging conduct this library classifies as newsletter scalping and paid stock promotion. No monetary relief has been recorded at this stage; the matter is an allegation and remains unproven.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24341 |
| Date filed | 2018-11-08 |
| Status | filed |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | conduct-based injunction, penny stock bar |
| Defendants | SeeThruEquity, LLC et al. |
| Techniques | Newsletter scalping , Paid stock promotion |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on November 8, 2018 as release LR-24341. The respondents named are SeeThruEquity, LLC et al. (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as newsletter scalping and paid stock promotion, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against equities.
Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction, penny stock bar.
This matter is at the allegation stage. Nothing in the regulator's filing has been proven, and the respondents are entitled to the presumption that it has not been. This page will be updated if the matter is resolved, dismissed or withdrawn.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Newsletter scalping — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Paid stock promotion — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-11-08 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. John David McAfee and Jimmy Gale Watson, Jr. (newsletter scalping, 2022) | SEC | 2022-07-15 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Brian Robert Sodi, et al. (newsletter scalping, 2019) | SEC | 2019-09-19 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion +1 | — | settled |
| SEC v. Micheal A. Skerry (newsletter scalping, 2017) | SEC | 2017-09-29 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion +1 | $100k | judgment |
| SEC v. Joey Giamichael and Umbrella Research, LLC (newsletter scalping, 2017) | SEC | 2017-07-25 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion | — | settled |
| CFTC v. Advanced Trading Workshop (newsletter scalping, 2016) | CFTC | 2016-09-28 | Newsletter Scalping , Paid Stock Promotion | $470k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gary S. Williky (insider trading, 2015) | SEC | 2015-03-02 | Insider Trading , Newsletter Scalping +3 | — | settled |