Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Robert S. "Lute" Davis, Jr., et al., Jordan E. Goodman., Alan H. New, et al. (ponzi schemes, 2018)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-robert-s-lute-davis-jr-et-al-jordan-e-goodman-alan-h-new-et-al-paid-stock-pr) by email

In December 2018 the SEC charged 13 more individuals and 10 companies for selling Woodbridge securities without registration; Jordan Goodman, who also touted Woodbridge without disclosing payment, settled for $2.29 million of disgorgement, $315,850 of interest and a $100,000 penalty. The figures in this record are Goodman's.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-24376
Date filed 2018-12-19
Date resolved 2018-12-19
Status settled
Criminal parallel No
Bars imposed penny stock bar
Defendants Robert S. "Lute" Davis, Jr., et al., Jordan E. Goodman., Alan H. New, et al. (individual)
Techniques Ponzi schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$100k
Disgorgement
$2.3m
Prejudgment interest
$316k
Total relief
$2.7m
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The SEC said the 13 sold more than $350 million of Woodbridge securities to more than 4,400 investors and earned millions of dollars in commissions. The same release reports settlements with Florida agents Barry and Ferne Kornfeld and Albert Klager, with separate amounts, and states that Synergy Investment Services, Alan New and David Knuth settled with amounts to be set by the court.

This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the document describes money from later investors being used to pay earlier ones. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2018-12-19 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Ponzi Schemes — settled
SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-13 Ponzi Schemes — filed
CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-07-24 Ponzi Schemes $449k judgment
CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-07-07 Ponzi Schemes — filed

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.