SEC v. Rajeshwar R. Gannamaneni, Deepthi Gandra, and Linga R. Gannamaneni (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In December 2018 the SEC charged an IT contractor at a Singapore investment bank, his wife and his father with insider trading ahead of at least 40 corporate events. In June 2019 the SEC announced that Rajeshwar Gannamaneni had agreed to pay $376,414 in disgorgement, $39,379 in interest and a $376,414 penalty. The SEC also said it would drop its claims against the wife and the father.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24371 |
| Date filed | 2018-12-10 |
| Date resolved | 2019-06-27 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Rajeshwar R. Gannamaneni ; Deepthi Gandra ; Linga R. Gannamaneni |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $376k
- Disgorgement
- $376k
- Prejudgment interest
- $39.4k
- Total relief
- $792k
- Alleged gain
- $600k
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged that Rajeshwar Gannamaneni took confidential client information about mergers, acquisitions and tender offers and gave it to his wife Deepthi Gandra and his father Linga Rao Gannamaneni, and also traded through an account in a family member's name. The complaint charged Section 10(b) and, against the two Gannamanenis, Section 14(e).
Outcome. In a release dated 27 June 2019 the SEC said Rajeshwar Gannamaneni had agreed to a settlement under which he is permanently enjoined from the antifraud and tender-offer fraud provisions and pays disgorgement of $376,414, prejudgment interest of $39,379 and a civil penalty of $376,414. The release says the settlement was subject to court approval and that the SEC had moved to voluntarily dismiss the claims against Gandra and Linga Rao Gannamaneni. This record uses the release date as the resolution date because the date the court entered the judgment was not found, and the dismissals of the two relatives were announced, not confirmed from a court order. The figures are for Rajeshwar Gannamaneni only. The facts described remain allegations; the release does not say whether he admitted them.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-12-10 Litigation release published
- 2019-06-27 SEC announces settlement with Rajeshwar Gannamaneni (subject to court approval) and move to dismiss the claims against two relatives
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-12-10 | SEC | SEC v. Rajeshwar R. Gannamaneni, Deepthi Gandra, and Linga R. Gannamaneni (insider trading, 2018) | Settled |
| 2019-06-27 | SEC | SEC v. Rajeshwar R. Gannamaneni, Deepthi Gandra, and Linga R. Gannamaneni (insider trading, 2019) | Settled |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |