SEC v. Matthew C. Woodard (2018)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2018 the SEC settled an administrative proceeding against Matthew C. Woodard, a former registered representative, imposing remedial sanctions based on a 2018 Connecticut order that permanently barred him.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-18581 |
| Date filed | 2018-07-10 |
| Date resolved | 2018-07-10 |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | bonds, equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | registration bar |
| Defendants | Matthew C. Woodard |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
On July 10, 2018 the SEC accepted a settlement with Matthew C. Woodard, a former registered representative at ProEquities, Inc. The order is a follow-on to a March 2018 Connecticut Department of Banking consent order barring him from the securities business there. That order alleged that in 2014 and 2015 he sold unregistered securities in a business he owned and took investor loans of $325,000, part of which he used personally.
The SEC does not itself find a Section 5 violation. The unregistered sales are an allegation in the state order recited as the basis for the bar, so the record carries no technique tag.
This library does not assign a technique tag to the matter, because no technique page in the current taxonomy describes the conduct the document records.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.