SEC v. Matthew Brunstrum and Susan Brunstrum (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In July 2018 the SEC charged former Stericycle analyst Matthew Brunstrum and his mother Susan with trading before its first-quarter 2016 results, with gains and avoided losses of $159,904 and $170,252. Both agreed to disgorgement of those amounts with interest, subject to court approval; the court will set penalties.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24212 |
| Date filed | 2018-07-24 |
| Date resolved | 2018-07-24 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Matthew Brunstrum ; Susan Brunstrum |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- $330k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $330k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged that Matthew learned through his job that results would be far worse than expected, traded, and told his mother, who traded as well. The stock fell about 22 percent after the April 28, 2016 announcement. Both consented to injunctions and disgorgement equal to their gains plus interest. The stored figure is the sum, $330,156; penalties were left for the court. A parallel criminal case is referenced.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-07-24 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |