SEC v. Mahmoud Ali Abdelkader (insider trading, 2023)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In March 2023 the SEC announced a settlement with Mahmoud Abdelkader, who bought Audentes call options in October 2019 after inferring from his wife's work that an acquisition was likely. He agreed to pay a $81,580 penalty and $90,570 in disgorgement and interest, subject to court approval.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25660 |
| Date filed | 2023-03-09 |
| Date resolved | 2023-03-09 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | options |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Mahmoud Ali Abdelkader |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $81.6k
- Disgorgement
- $90.6k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $172k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the settled complaint on March 9, 2023 as litigation release 25660, filed in the Northern District of California.
The complaint alleges Abdelkader misappropriated information from his wife, an Audentes employee, and bought short-dated out-of-the-money calls before the December 2, 2019 announcement of Astellas's roughly $3 billion purchase; the stock rose about 106%.
The figure of $90,570 combines disgorgement and prejudgment interest as the release states them, and court approval was pending, so the status is settled rather than judgment.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2023-03-09 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |