SEC v. Madan (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2018 the SEC settled with Anup Madan, a LabCorp scientist who bought 9,300 Sequenom shares after learning of LabCorp's tender offer on a diligence visit. He agreed to an injunction, disgorgement of about $14,023 and an equal penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24221 |
| Date filed | 2018-08-01 |
| Date resolved | 2018-08-01 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Anup Madan |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $14k
- Disgorgement
- $14k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $28k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged that Madan, despite signing an insider trading policy, bought the shares over two trading days and sold on the announcement date, when the price rose 176 percent, for a profit of over $14,000. The release states that the $14,023 penalty equals the disgorgement amount.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-08-01 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |