SEC v. Lozuk (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In July 2018 the SEC settled with Robert Lozuk, a former Sequenom executive who tipped a friend about LabCorp's tender offer; the friend bought 18,000 shares and made over $26,000. Lozuk consented to an injunction, a $26,643 penalty and a five-year officer-and-director bar.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24222 |
| Date filed | 2018-08-01 |
| Date resolved | 2018-08-01 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | five-year officer-and-director bar |
| Defendants | Robert Lozuk |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.14(e) and Rule 14e-3 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $26.6k
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $26.6k
- Alleged gain
- $26.6k
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged that Lozuk, who had signed a confidentiality letter and was bound by company policy, told a friend a week before the July 2016 announcement; the friend bought 18,000 Sequenom shares over two days and sold on the day of the announcement, when the price rose 176 percent. The friend agreed to disgorge $26,643 under a deferred prosecution agreement and is not a defendant here.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-08-01 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |