Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. Louis T. Buonocore, Jeremy R. Draper, Frank J. Morelli, III, Berardino "Dino" Paolucci, Jr. and Don L. Rose (matched orders, 2016)

Settled

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission settled an action with Louis T. Buonocore, Jeremy R. Draper, Frank J. Morelli, III, Berardino "Dino" Paolucci, Jr. and Don L. Rose, alleging conduct this library classifies as matched orders. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23668
Date filed 2016-09-30
Date resolved 2016-09-30
Court U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Bars imposed penny stock bar
Defendants Louis T. Buonocore, Jeremy R. Draper, Frank J. Morelli, III, Berardino "Dino" Paolucci, Jr. (individual) ; Don L. Rose (individual)
Techniques Matched orders

What was ordered

Civil penalty
Disgorgement
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
Alleged gain
$3.2m

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 30, 2016 as release LR-23668. The respondents named are Louis T. Buonocore, Jeremy R. Draper, Frank J. Morelli, III, Berardino "Dino" Paolucci, Jr. and Don L. Rose (2 individuals, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania.

This library tags the matter as matched orders, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

Non-monetary relief recorded: penny stock bar.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2016-09-30 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. RSE Markets, Inc. (matched orders, 2023) SEC 2023-07-12 Matched Orders settled
SEC v. Legal & General Investment Management America, Inc. (matched orders, 2022) SEC 2022-11-21 Matched Orders settled
SEC v. William Scott Lawler, Esq. (matched orders, 2021) SEC 2021-08-18 Matched Orders , Wash Trading judgment
SEC v. Ahmad Haris Tajyar and Eric Leo Marsoubian (marking the close, 2021) SEC 2021-08-13 Marking The Close , Matched Orders +1 $220k settled
SEC v. Ron Phillips (matched orders, 2021) SEC 2021-06-30 Matched Orders $30k judgment
CFTC v. Coinbase Inc. (exchange wash trading, 2021) CFTC 2021-03-19 Exchange Wash Trading , Matched Orders +1 $6.5m judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.