SEC v. Kit Mun Chan, Lau Kean Chong, Chong Poui Fan, Binji Lu, and Youn Chien Wong (matched orders, 2020)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In February 2020, a New York federal court entered final judgments against five foreign traders accused of entering matched orders in Medico International (MDDT) stock, ordering about US$1.15 million in disgorgement, interest and civil penalties.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24746 |
| Date filed | 2020-02-21 |
| Date resolved | 2020-02-11 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Kit Mun Chan ; Lau Kean Chong ; Chong Poui Fan ; Binji Lu ; Youn Chien Wong |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.9(a)(1) ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques | Matched orders |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $775k
- Disgorgement
- $365k
- Prejudgment interest
- $6k
- Total relief
- $1.1m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on February 21, 2020 as release LR-24746. The respondents named are Kit Mun Chan, Lau Kean Chong, Chong Poui Fan, Binji Lu and Youn Chien Wong (5 individuals, 0 entities).
The SEC alleged that traders in China, Singapore and Malaysia entered buy and sell orders for MDDT at nearly the same times, sizes and prices, that their trades made up 70 percent of the volume over the period, and that IP records suggest at least three accounts were used by the same person or people. Lau Kean Chong consented; the other four judgments were by default.
This library tags the matter as matched orders, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
Chong: disgorgement of $151,957, interest of $1,523.73 and a $17,000 penalty. Lu: disgorgement of $144,772.20 and interest of $3,049.52. Wong: disgorgement of $67,965.20 and interest of $1,431.64. Chan, Fan, Lu and Wong: a $189,427 penalty each. The record totals $364,694 in disgorgement and $774,708 in penalties.
The court entered permanent injunctions and penny stock bars; four judgments were by default.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Matched orders — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2020-02-21 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-21 | SEC | SEC v. Kit Mun Chan, Lau Kean Chong, Chong Poui Fan, Binji Lu, and Youn Chien Wong (matched orders, 2019) | Judgment entered |
| 2020-02-21 | SEC | SEC v. Kit Mun Chan, Lau Kean Chong, Chong Poui Fan, Binji Lu, and Youn Chien Wong (matched orders, 2020) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBI v. Shreedhar Yellaiah Kodam (synchronized trades, Well Pack Papers, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-09-22 | Matched Orders , Price Manipulation | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Corey Ortiz (free riding and parking, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-03 | Free Riding And Parking , Matched Orders | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Hanif Shekh and others (price and volume manipulation in five scrips, Mauria Udyog and others, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-06-30 | Matched Orders , Pump And Dump +1 | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Christopher Flagg, Daquan Lloyd and Travis Treusch (free riding and parking, 2026) | SEC | 2026-04-30 | Free Riding And Parking , Matched Orders | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Harsha Ishvarbhai Solanki and others (trading in ANI Integrated Services, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-02-12 | Price Manipulation , Matched Orders | — | judgment |
| SEBI adjudication orders on illiquid stock options at BSE (2026 batch) | SEBI (India) | 2026-01-05 | Matched Orders | — | judgment |