SEC v. Joseph Michael Todd, Todd Financial Services, LLC and TFS Insurance Services LLC (2023)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In July 2023 the SEC announced a settlement with Joseph Michael Todd, Todd Financial Services, LLC and 1 other. The complaint alleges that Todd, a former registered representative, took at least $3 million from at least 20 brokerage customers, many of them seniors, kept it for personal use and forged account statements; Ponzi-like payments to one customer are a minor allegation. All three defendants consented to injunctions and an officer-and-director bar, with money relief to be set by the court.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25777 |
| Date filed | 2023-07-13 |
| Date resolved | 2023-07-13 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | conduct-based injunction, officer-and-director bar |
| Defendants | Joseph Michael Todd ; Todd Financial Services, LLC ; TFS Insurance Services LLC |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on July 13, 2023 as release LR-25777. The complaint alleges that Todd, a former registered representative, took at least $3 million from at least 20 brokerage customers, many of them seniors, kept it for personal use and forged account statements; Ponzi-like payments to one customer are a minor allegation. All three defendants consented to injunctions and an officer-and-director bar, with money relief to be set by the court.
This library does not tag the matter as a Ponzi scheme: on a source check, the document mentions Ponzi-like payments only in passing, or as part of another party's scheme, and the charges are about something else. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction, officer-and-director bar.
Timeline
- 2023-07-13 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.