SEC v. Honglan Wang (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2018 the SEC settled proceedings against MyoKardia scientist Honglan Wang, who bought 8,600 shares before positive drug trial results and made $134,000, then self-reported. She agreed to pay $134,000 disgorgement, $3,698 interest and a $67,000 penalty, half the usual amount.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-83857 |
| Date filed | 2018-08-16 |
| Date resolved | 2018-08-16 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Honglan Wang |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $67k
- Disgorgement
- $134k
- Prejudgment interest
- $3.7k
- Total relief
- $205k
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Commission found that Wang learned of the trial result through her employment, bought the shares, and sold on August 7, 2017 when the price rose 83 percent. She reported her trading to staff before an investigation had begun. On her consent, the order imposes disgorgement of $134,000, interest of $3,698 and a penalty of $67,000.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |