Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. George Ivakhnik and The Mobile Star Corporation (fake press releases, 2015)

Alleged — pending

These are allegations. SEC has filed an action; nothing in it has been proven, and the respondents have not been found liable. Everything described on this page is what the regulator alleges, not what a court has found. See our editorial policy.

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action against George Ivakhnik and The Mobile Star Corporation, alleging conduct this library classifies as fake press releases. No monetary relief has been recorded at this stage; the matter is an allegation and remains unproven.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23353
Date filed 2015-09-17
Status filed
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Defendants George Ivakhnik (individual) ; The Mobile Star Corporation (entity)
Techniques Fake press releases

What was ordered

Civil penalty
Disgorgement
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 17, 2015 as release LR-23353. The respondents named are George Ivakhnik and The Mobile Star Corporation (1 individual, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as fake press releases, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

This matter is at the allegation stage. Nothing in the regulator's filing has been proven, and the respondents are entitled to the presumption that it has not been. This page will be updated if the matter is resolved, dismissed or withdrawn.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-09-17 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Muhammad Saad Shoukat and others (fake press releases, 2026) SEC 2026-01-06 Fake Press Releases , Insider Trading filed
SEC v. In Ovations Holdings, Inc. and Mark Goldberg (fake press releases, 2022) SEC 2022-12-09 Fake Press Releases , Paid Stock Promotion judgment
SEC v. Michael J. Starkweather and Andiamo Corporation (fake press releases, 2021) SEC 2021-12-03 Fake Press Releases , Paid Stock Promotion judgment
SEC v. Mark A. Miller (fake press releases, 2021) SEC 2021-06-21 Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump unknown
SEC v. Mark E. Fisher, Esq. (fake press releases, 2018) SEC 2018-11-02 Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump judgment
SEC v. Brian Weber and Bebida Beverage Co. (fake press releases, 2018) SEC 2018-10-31 Fake Press Releases , Paid Stock Promotion judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. If this matter has since resolved, been withdrawn or been dismissed, we want to know: submit a correction.