Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. George Ivakhnik and The Mobile Star Corporation (fake press releases, 2015)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-george-ivakhnik-fake-press-releases-2015) by email

The SEC's September 2015 case over fake press releases issued by The Mobile Star Corporation and its CEO George Ivakhnik ended, as to Ivakhnik, in a consent judgment filed on 11 March 2016 in the Southern District of New York. It orders $1,575 in disgorgement, $126.66 in interest and a $150,000 penalty, and bars him as an officer or director. The company's outcome was not read.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-23353
Date filed 2015-09-17
Date resolved 2016-03-11
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Bars imposed officer-and-director bar
Defendants George Ivakhnik (individual) ; The Mobile Star Corporation (entity)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Exchange Act s.20(a) (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Fake press releases

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$150k
Disgorgement
$1.6k
Prejudgment interest
$127
Total relief
$152k
Alleged gain
—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 17, 2015 as release LR-23353. The respondents named are George Ivakhnik and The Mobile Star Corporation (1 individual, 1 entity).

This library tags the matter as fake press releases, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against equities.

Nothing in the regulator's filing has been proven, and the respondents are entitled to the presumption that it has not been. This page will be updated if the matter is resolved, dismissed or withdrawn.

Ivakhnik consented to the judgment without admitting or denying the allegations. It enjoins him from violating Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5, permanently prohibits him from acting as an officer or director of an issuer with registered securities, and orders disgorgement of $1,575, prejudgment interest of $126.66 and a civil penalty of $150,000, $151,701.66 in total. The judgment is the SEC's resolution of its claims against him; I did not read any judgment against The Mobile Star Corporation, so this page does not say how the case ended for the company.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary documents linked above. This page summarises the structured record and does not reproduce them.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-09-17 Litigation release published
  2. 2016-03-11 Consent final judgment filed as to Ivakhnik (S.D.N.Y.)

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEBI v. Kalahridhaan Trendz Limited and others (false corporate announcements, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-07-30 Misleading Issuer Disclosure , Fake Press Releases — judgment
SEC v. Muhammad Saad Shoukat and others (fake press releases, 2026) SEC 2026-01-06 Fake Press Releases , Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jeremy Koski (fake press releases, 2023) SEC 2023-09-01 Fake Press Releases $100k settled
SEC v. In Ovations Holdings, Inc. and Mark Goldberg (fake press releases, 2022) SEC 2022-12-09 Fake Press Releases — judgment
SEC v. Michael J. Starkweather and Andiamo Corporation (fake press releases, 2021) SEC 2021-12-03 Fake Press Releases — judgment
SEC v. Mark A. Miller (fake press releases, 2021) SEC 2021-06-21 Fake Press Releases , Pump And Dump — judgment

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.