SEC v. Fred Tinker (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In July 2018 the SEC settled proceedings against Synaptics finance vice president Fred Tinker, who bought 10,000 shares in his wife's account while aware of a Chinese investment group's takeover approach. He agreed to pay $89,171.88 disgorgement, $8,506.64 interest and an $89,171.88 penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 34-83742 |
| Date filed | 2018-07-31 |
| Date resolved | 2018-07-31 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | Nasdaq |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Fred Tinker |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $89.2k
- Disgorgement
- $89.2k
- Prejudgment interest
- $8.5k
- Total relief
- $187k
- Alleged gain
- $89.2k
What is alleged to have happened
The Commission found that in August and September 2015 Tinker, aware of the confidential approach, bought the shares, which gained about $89,172 after Bloomberg reported that Synaptics had rejected an offer and talks were continuing. On his consent, the order requires disgorgement of $89,171.88, prejudgment interest of $8,506.64 and a penalty of $89,171.88, payable in installments.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |