SEC v. David A. Zimliki and Russel P. Schiefer (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In May 2018 the SEC charged two Pennsylvania men with trading Golden Enterprises shares before its merger with Utz, and both settled. David Zimliki's profit was $9,319 and Russell Schiefer's $5,877, and the settlement terms are disgorgement with interest and penalties equal to each profit.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24134 |
| Date filed | 2018-05-04 |
| Date resolved | 2018-05-04 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Middle District of Pennsylvania |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | David A. Zimliki ; Russel P. Schiefer |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $15.2k
- Disgorgement
- $15.2k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $30.4k
- Alleged gain
- $15.2k
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged that Zimliki learned of the planned merger from a close friend, bought shares and tipped Schiefer, who also bought. They sold after the announcement. Both consented to injunctions, disgorgement plus interest and penalties equal to their profits. The stored figures are the combined profits ($15,196) and the matching penalties; interest is not itemised in the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-05-04 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |