SEC v. Brady Jack Speers, Chatree Thiranon and GHAP, LLC d/b/a Blue Star Texas (2023)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2023 the SEC announced a settlement with Brady Jack Speers, Chatree Thiranon and 1 other. The complaint alleges a house-flipping offering that raised almost $8 million from 40 investors, with more than $2.9 million misused for personal expenses and Ponzi-like payments. The three defendants consented to a partial settlement, subject to court approval, leaving money relief to the court and providing for a liquidation agent.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-25818 |
| Date filed | 2023-08-31 |
| Date resolved | 2023-08-31 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of Texas |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | conduct-based injunction |
| Defendants | Brady Jack Speers ; Chatree Thiranon ; GHAP, LLC d/b/a Blue Star Texas |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 ; Securities Act s.17(a) ; Securities Act s.5 |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on August 31, 2023 as release LR-25818. The complaint alleges a house-flipping offering that raised almost $8 million from 40 investors, with more than $2.9 million misused for personal expenses and Ponzi-like payments. The three defendants consented to a partial settlement, subject to court approval, leaving money relief to the court and providing for a liquidation agent.
This library does not tag the matter as a Ponzi scheme: on a source check, the document mentions Ponzi-like payments only in passing, or as part of another party's scheme, and the charges are about something else. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction.
Timeline
- 2023-08-31 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.