SEC v. Anthony C. Snell and Charles E. LeCroy (2007)
Dismissed
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In May 2007 an SEC administrative law judge dismissed the charge that Anthony Snell and Charles LeCroy, former J.P. Morgan Securities public finance bankers, violated municipal securities consultant rule G-38. The two had already been barred from the industry after pleading guilty to wire fraud. The matter has nothing to do with insider trading.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 3-12359 |
| Date filed | 2007-05-03 |
| Date resolved | 2007-05-03 |
| Court | SEC administrative law judge |
| Status | dismissed |
| Asset class | bonds |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: sentenced (Anthony Snell and Charles LeCroy; LeCroy received three months' incarceration, Snell ninety days' house arrest and probation), U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania |
| Bars imposed | registration bar |
| Defendants | Anthony C. Snell and Charles E. LeCroy |
| Cited as charged or alleged | 18 U.S.C. 1343 (wire fraud) |
| Techniques |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Securities and Exchange Commission issued the initial decision on May 3, 2007 (administrative proceeding 3-12359).
The proceeding followed felony convictions of Snell and LeCroy for wire fraud, on which the judge had earlier granted partial summary disposition and barred them from associating with municipal securities firms. The remaining question was whether they violated Municipal Securities Rulemaking Board Rule G-38 and Exchange Act Section 15B(c)(1) in connection with consultant payments made on behalf of J.P. Morgan Securities.
The judge dismissed both charges. The insider-trading tag had no basis in the decision and has been removed; the earlier bars rested on the criminal convictions.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
Timeline
- 2007-05-03 Initial decision
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.