SEC v. Aaron O'Brian Freeman (free riding and parking, 2025)
Alleged — pending
These are allegations. SEC has filed an action; nothing in it has been proven, and the respondents have not been found liable. Everything described on this page is what the regulator alleges, not what a court has found. See our editorial policy.
Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.
In 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission brought an action against Aaron O'Brian Freeman, alleging conduct this library classifies as free riding and parking. No monetary relief has been recorded at this stage; the matter is an allegation and remains unproven.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-26407 |
| Date filed | 2025-09-22 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina |
| Status | filed |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | conduct-based injunction |
| Defendants | Aaron O'Brian Freeman |
| Techniques | Free riding and parking |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
the Securities and Exchange Commission announced this matter on September 22, 2025 as release LR-26407. The respondents named are Aaron O'Brian Freeman (1 individual, 0 entities). The action was brought in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of North Carolina.
This library tags the matter as free riding and parking, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
Non-monetary relief recorded: conduct-based injunction.
This matter is at the allegation stage. Nothing in the regulator's filing has been proven, and the respondents are entitled to the presumption that it has not been. This page will be updated if the matter is resolved, dismissed or withdrawn.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Free riding and parking — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2025-09-22 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Corey Ortiz (free riding and parking, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-03 | Free Riding And Parking | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Mayur Baviskar (free riding and parking, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-26 | Free Riding And Parking | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Christopher Flagg and others (free riding and parking, 2026) | SEC | 2026-04-30 | Free Riding And Parking | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Cyrus P. Naderi (free riding and parking, 2025) | SEC | 2025-11-18 | Free Riding And Parking | $40k | judgment |
| SEC v. Eduardo Hernandez (free riding and parking, 2025) | SEC | 2025-07-03 | Free Riding And Parking | — | judgment |
| SEC v. Rey D. Acosta (free riding and parking, 2025) | SEC | 2025-03-06 | Free Riding And Parking | $15k | judgment |