SEC v. A. Catlin Cade, IV (insider trading, 2018)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In August 2018 the SEC charged Alabama accountant A. Catlin Cade IV with buying Golden Enterprises shares the day before its Utz merger was announced, using information from tax work for a company owned by a board member, and settled. He agreed to an injunction, disgorgement of his $8,745 profit with interest, and an equal penalty.
The record
| Agency | SEC |
|---|---|
| Release number | LR-24240 |
| Date filed | 2018-08-21 |
| Date resolved | 2018-08-21 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | equities |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | A. Catlin Cade, IV |
| Cited as charged or alleged | Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 |
| Techniques | Insider trading |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $8.7k
- Disgorgement
- $8.7k
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $17.5k
- Alleged gain
- $8.7k
What is alleged to have happened
The SEC alleged that Cade bought 2,000 shares for $22,467 immediately after learning of the merger through his work, and sold after the announcement the next day for a profit of $8,745. He consented to a permanent injunction, disgorgement plus interest and a penalty equal to his profit. The release refers to a parallel criminal matter. Interest is not itemised, so the stored figures are the profit-based amounts.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Insider trading — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2018-08-21 Litigation release published
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Insider Trading | $109k | settled |
| CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-28 | Insider Trading | $65k | judgment |
| SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-21 | Insider Trading | — | filed |
| SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-13 | Insider Trading | — | dismissed |
| SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Insider Trading | $18.7k | settled |