Market Manipulation. Search

SEC v. A. Catlin Cade, IV (insider trading, 2018)

Settled

Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (sec-a-catlin-cade-iv-insider-trading-2018) by email

In August 2018 the SEC charged Alabama accountant A. Catlin Cade IV with buying Golden Enterprises shares the day before its Utz merger was announced, using information from tax work for a company owned by a board member, and settled. He agreed to an injunction, disgorgement of his $8,745 profit with interest, and an equal penalty.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency SEC
Release number LR-24240
Date filed 2018-08-21
Date resolved 2018-08-21
Court U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama
Status settled
Asset class equities
Criminal parallel No
Defendants A. Catlin Cade, IV (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Exchange Act s.10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$8.7k
Disgorgement
$8.7k
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
$17.5k
Alleged gain
$8.7k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

The SEC alleged that Cade bought 2,000 shares for $22,467 immediately after learning of the merger through his work, and sold after the announcement the next day for a profit of $8,745. He consented to a permanent injunction, disgorgement plus interest and a penalty equal to his profit. The release refers to a parallel criminal matter. Interest is not itemised, so the stored figures are the profit-based amounts.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2018-08-21 Litigation release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading $109k settled
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment
SEC v. Gavin Wolfe and others (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEC v. Jesse R. Mitchell (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-21 Insider Trading — filed
SEBI v. Arun Kumar Somani and others (insider trading review, Indian Oil Corporation, 2026) SEBI (India) 2026-08-13 Insider Trading — dismissed
SEC v. Benjamin Tesfaye (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Insider Trading $18.7k settled

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.