SEBI v. Murari Lal Sarda and others (front running of Thar Share Brokers group trades, 2024)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 8, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the order; an independent second reading of 60 SEBI records agreed on every field for 56, the four misses being penalty amounts; a later sample of 50 of the SEBI records added on 9 October agreed on every field for 46. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In November 2024 SEBI found that five related traders had front run the orders of three connected Jaipur companies on the strength of information passed on by a sixth person who placed those orders. The order directed disgorgement of Rs 1,43,20,173, restrained the six for 1 or 2 years and imposed penalties of Rs 45,00,000 in total.
The record
| Agency | SEBI (India) |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2024-11-28 |
| Date resolved | 2024-11-28 |
| Court | SEBI executive director / chief general manager |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Instruments | equity shares and NSE equity derivatives traded ahead of the big clients' orders |
| Venue | NSE |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | restrained from the securities market for 1 year (Murari Lal and Sushila Sarda) or 2 years (the other four noticees) |
| Defendants | Murari Lal Sarda ; Sushila Sarda ; Vikas Sarda ; Vikas Sarda HUF ; Preeti V Sarda ; Ashish Sarda |
| Techniques | Front running |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- 4.5m INR
What is alleged to have happened
The order of 28 November 2024 was issued by SEBI quasi-judicial authority G. Ramar. The six noticees were Murari Lal Sarda and his wife Sushila Sarda, Vikas Sarda, the Vikas Sarda HUF and Preeti V Sarda, and Ashish Sarda. SEBI examined trading from January 2022 to June 2023 after a surveillance alert.
The 'big clients' were Parshvanath Finvest Pvt Ltd, Thar Share Brokers Pvt Ltd and Gangwal Commodities Pvt Ltd, three Jaipur entities sharing an address and directors who were husband and wife. SEBI alleged that noticees 1 to 5 traded ahead of the big clients' orders and that Ashish Sarda, who placed those orders through the broker, acted as the information carrier and received funds from the front runners. It found the big clients' orders accounted for a considerable share of volume in the scrips involved.
The order finds the front running established over about one and a half years. The front runners' profits, on the order's table, were Rs 86,78,961 in the cash segment and Rs 56,41,212 in the derivatives segment of NSE, totalling Rs 1,43,20,173. It found that Ashish Sarda facilitated the trades as the information carrier.
SEBI directed noticees 1, 2, 4 and 5 to disgorge Rs 1,43,20,173 with liability allocated between related pairs, restrained Murari Lal Sarda and Sushila Sarda for 1 year and the other four for 2 years, and imposed section 15HA penalties of Rs 5,00,000 on each of the first five noticees and Rs 20,00,000 on Ashish Sarda, Rs 45,00,000 in all. It also froze asset sales except for paying the disgorgement and penalties.
The record does not show whether anyone appealed, whether the money was paid, or what the broker's own role was; a separate order dealt with the broker's compliance failures. No criminal case is mentioned.
This library tags the matter as front running. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the order.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Front running — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2024-11-28 SEBI order
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBI v. Bhavik Indravadan Shah and others (front running a broker client, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-19 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Madhav Stock Vision Pvt. Ltd. and others (front running a large institutional client, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-07-24 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Prijesh Kurani and others (front running a broker's client orders, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-04-30 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Ashok Maheshwari and others (front running a portfolio manager's trades, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-04-27 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Vishvanath Goswami and others (front running a foreign fund's trades, Chaturvedi group, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-03-27 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Sunny Bhatia and others (front running Sarvottam Securities trades, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-03-24 | Front Running | — | judgment |