SEBI v. Vishal Vijay Shah (Sterling Group front-running broker, 2022)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 8, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, in a single reading of the order; an independent second reading of 60 SEBI records agreed on every field for 56, the four misses being penalty amounts; a later sample of 50 of the SEBI records added on 9 October agreed on every field for 46. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
A SEBI adjudicating officer fined stock broker Vishal Vijay Shah a total of Rs 8 lakh in April 2022 in the Manish Chaturvedi front-running matter. The order finds he created false records of trades for two entities and did not comply with SEBI summonses.
The record
| Agency | SEBI (India) |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2022-04-29 |
| Date resolved | 2022-04-29 |
| Court | SEBI adjudicating officer |
| Status | judgment |
| Asset class | equities |
| Venue | BSE |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Vishal Vijay Shah (proprietor, M/s Vishal Vijay Shah) |
| Techniques | Front running |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- 800k INR
What is alleged to have happened
A SEBI adjudicating officer, Suresh B Menon, decided the matter on 29 April 2022. The noticee was Vishal Vijay Shah, a registered stock broker trading as a proprietorship in Mumbai. The order is one of several in the matter of front-running by Manish Chaturvedi and others, which started from NSE surveillance reports on the trades of about ten companies and entities known as the Sterling Group between 2010 and 2011.
SEBI alleged that Mr Shah issued fictitious documents to Laxmi Chaturvedi and Viraj Mercantile Pvt Ltd for trades that had not occurred through him on BSE, creating false records. It also alleged that he failed to produce the documents and comply with summonses in 2013, in breach of sections 11C(2) and 11C(3) of the SEBI Act, and breached the broker code of conduct. Mr Shah argued that the notice rested on assumptions, that the two were never his clients, that he issued no fake contract notes, and that the notice came more than 2,000 days after the summons.
The officer found the violations established and noted that penalty follows contravention regardless of intent. He imposed Rs 2 lakh for the summons failures, Rs 3 lakh for fraud under section 12A and the PFUTP regulations, and Rs 3 lakh for breach of the broker code of conduct, a total of Rs 8,00,000, payable within 45 days. The order noted that SEBI had earlier suspended his broker registration for six months in December 2018, and that no profit or loss figure for the violations was available.
The record does not show whether the penalty was appealed or paid, or how much unlawful gain, if any, flowed from the trades his records covered.
This library tags the matter as front running. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the order.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Front running — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2022-04-29 SEBI order
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEBI v. Bhavik Indravadan Shah and others (front running a broker client, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-08-19 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Madhav Stock Vision Pvt. Ltd. and others (front running a large institutional client, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-07-24 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Prijesh Kurani and others (front running a broker's client orders, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-04-30 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Ashok Maheshwari and others (front running a portfolio manager's trades, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-04-27 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Vishvanath Goswami and others (front running a foreign fund's trades, Chaturvedi group, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-03-27 | Front Running | — | judgment |
| SEBI v. Sunny Bhatia and others (front running Sarvottam Securities trades, 2026) | SEBI (India) | 2026-03-24 | Front Running | — | judgment |