Market Manipulation. Search

OSC v. Mughal Asset Management Corporation and others (ponzi schemes, 2022)

Judgment entered

Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (osc-mughal-asset-management-corporation-ponzi-schemes-2022) by email

In June 2022 Ontario Securities Commission staff alleged that Usman Asif used Mughal Asset Management and Lendle Corporation to run a Ponzi scheme that also funded his lifestyle. The tribunal's June 2024 order imposed permanent bans, an $800,000 joint penalty, a further $350,000 on Asif and disgorgement of $661,077 plus US$245,000, and $70,000 for the Lendle fraud.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency OSC
Release number 2022-15
Date filed 2022-06-16
Date resolved 2024-06-03
Court Capital Markets Tribunal (Ontario)
Status judgment
Asset class crypto
Criminal parallel No
Bars imposed trading ban
Defendants Mughal Asset Management Corporation (entity) ; Lendle Corporation (entity) ; Usman Asif (individual)
Cited as charged or alleged Ontario Securities Act s.126.1 (statutes and rules cited in the document; not a finding that they were violated)
Techniques Ponzi schemes

What was ordered

Civil penalty
—
Disgorgement
—
Prejudgment interest
—
Total relief
—
Alleged gain
—
Penalty as published
C$800k

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars. This regulator states penalties in CAD. The figure is recorded as published and is not converted, so it does not appear in the USD totals or medians used elsewhere on this site.

What is alleged to have happened

The statement of allegations said Mughal presented itself as a Toronto investment manager with client agreements and monthly statements, and that Asif used it and Lendle, formed in 2019, to operate a Ponzi scheme in which new investors' money paid returns to earlier ones and funded residential property purchases.

After a merits decision in 2023, the sanctions order of June 3, 2024 bans the respondents from trading and from acting as registrants or promoters permanently, orders Mughal, Lendle and Asif jointly to pay an $800,000 administrative penalty and to disgorge $661,077 and US$245,000 for the Mughal fraud, orders Lendle and Asif to disgorge $70,000 for the Lendle fraud, orders Asif to pay a further $350,000 penalty and bars him as a director or officer, and awards costs of $295,413.65. The earlier summary said no monetary figure had been extracted.

This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the tribunal or the court it relies on describes money from later investors being used to pay earlier ones. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2022-06-14 Statement of Allegations
  2. 2022-06-16 Notice of Hearing
  3. 2022-07-21 Reasons and Decision
  4. 2022-10-21 Other
  5. 2022-10-28 Reasons and Decision
  6. 2022-11-18 Reasons and Decision
  7. 2022-12-14 Reasons and Decision
  8. 2022-12-14 Statement of Allegations
  9. 2023-01-17 Reasons and Decision
  10. 2023-04-26 Reasons and Decision
  11. 2023-11-02 Reasons and Decision
  12. 2023-11-02 Reasons and Decision

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Ponzi Schemes — settled
SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-13 Ponzi Schemes — filed
CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-08-11 Ponzi Schemes — filed
SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) SEC 2026-07-24 Ponzi Schemes $449k judgment
CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) CFTC 2026-07-07 Ponzi Schemes — filed

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.