OSC v. Fernando Honorate Fagundes also known as Henry Roche and New Futures Trading International Corporation (ponzi schemes, 2013)

Judgment entered

✓ Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.

Report an error in this record (osc-fernando-honorate-fagundes-also-known-as-henry-roche-ponzi-schemes-2013) by email

In 2013, the regulator obtained a judgment against Fernando Honorate Fagundes also known as Henry Roche and New Futures Trading International Corporation, alleging conduct this library classifies as ponzi schemes. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.

The record

What was ordered

Civil penalty

—

Disgorgement

—

Prejudgment interest

—

Total relief

—

Alleged gain

—

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the regulator announced this matter on March 18, 2013. The respondents named are Fernando Honorate Fagundes also known as Henry Roche and New Futures Trading International Corporation (1 individual, 1 entity). The action was brought in the Capital Markets Tribunal (Ontario).

This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against futures.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

• Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.

Timeline

1. 2013-03-18 Notice of Hearing
2. 2013-03-18 Statement of Allegations
3. 2013-04-09 Reasons and Decision
4. 2013-04-09 Reasons and Decision
5. 2013-04-18 Reasons and Decision
6. 2013-05-31 Reasons and Decision
7. 2013-05-31 Reasons and Decision

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

• Tribunal proceeding
• Notice of Hearing
• Statement of Allegations
• Reasons and Decision
• Reasons and Decision
• Reasons and Decision
• Reasons and Decision
• Reasons and Decision

The linked release is published by the issuing regulator under its own terms. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Related actions

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Record added September 10, 2026. submit a correction.