FCA v. Philippe Moryoussef Individual (benchmark submission rigging, 2022)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 3, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In July 2022 the FCA prohibited former Barclays manager Philippe Moryoussef from regulated functions after his 2018 conviction for conspiracy to defraud over EURIBOR submissions made at Barclays under his supervision, for which he was sentenced to eight years in prison. No fine was imposed.
The record
| Agency | FCA |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2022-07-15 |
| Date resolved | 2022-07-15 |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | Yes: sentenced (Philippe Moryoussef), Southwark Crown Court, 2018-07-19 |
| Sentence | 8 years |
| Defendants | Philippe Moryoussef |
| Techniques | Benchmark submission rigging |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The Financial Conduct Authority issued this final notice on 15 July 2022, prohibiting Moryoussef under section 56 of the Act. It relies on his conviction on 29 June 2018 of one count of conspiracy to defraud relating to EURIBOR submissions made at Barclays under his supervision, and his sentence on 19 July 2018 to eight years' imprisonment.
The FCA concluded the conviction showed a serious lack of honesty and integrity, that the offence was committed while he was an approved person, and that he is not fit and proper. The notice imposes no financial penalty.
This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging because the conviction concerns EURIBOR submissions. The record had shown the status as filed and named him with the word Individual.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Benchmark submission rigging — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2022-07-15 FCA final notice
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FCA v. Colin Bermingham Individual (benchmark submission rigging, 2021) | FCA | 2021-09-27 | Benchmark Submission Rigging | — | settled |
| FCA v. Terry John Farr (benchmark submission rigging, 2019) | FCA | 2019-05-29 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Wash Trading | — | judgment |
| FCA v. Jonathan Mathew Individual (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | FCA | 2018-10-30 | Benchmark Submission Rigging | — | judgment |
| CFTC v. Bank of America (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-19 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $30m | judgment |
| CFTC v. ICAP Capital Markets LLC (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-18 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $50m | judgment |
| FCA v. Christian Bittar (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | FCA | 2018-09-14 | Benchmark Submission Rigging | — | judgment |