FCA v. David Caplin (benchmark submission rigging, 2015)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In 2015, the Financial Conduct Authority settled an action with David Caplin, alleging conduct this library classifies as benchmark submission rigging, price manipulation and wash trading. The release does not state a monetary figure that we were able to extract.
The record
| Agency | FCA |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2015-01-22 |
| Date resolved | 2015-01-22 |
| Status | settled |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | David Caplin |
| Techniques | Benchmark submission rigging , Price manipulation |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- £210k
What is alleged to have happened
the Financial Conduct Authority announced this matter on January 22, 2015. The respondents named are David Caplin (1 individual, 0 entities).
This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging, price manipulation and wash trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Benchmark submission rigging — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2015-01-22 FCA final notice
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTC v. Bank of America (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-19 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $30m | judgment |
| CFTC v. ICAP Capital Markets LLC (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-18 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $50m | judgment |
| CFTC v. BNP Paribas (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-08-29 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $90m | judgment |
| CFTC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-06-18 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $65m | judgment |
| CFTC v. Société Générale S.A. (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-06-04 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $475m | judgment |
| CFTC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-02-01 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $70m | judgment |