FCA v. Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen–Boerenleenbank B.A. (‘Rabobank’) (benchmark submission rigging, 2013)
Settled
Checked against the primary document on October 2, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In October 2013 the FCA fined Rabobank £105 million for misconduct relating to LIBOR, after an early-settlement discount of 30 percent from £150 million.
The record
| Agency | FCA |
|---|---|
| Date filed | 2013-10-29 |
| Date resolved | 2013-10-29 |
| Status | settled |
| Asset class | futures, fx |
| Venue | OTC |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Defendants | Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen–Boerenleenbank B.A. (‘Rabobank’) |
| Techniques | Benchmark submission rigging , Cash versus derivatives schemes , Price manipulation |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- —
- Disgorgement
- —
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- —
- Alleged gain
- —
- Penalty as published
- £105m
What is alleged to have happened
the Financial Conduct Authority announced this matter on October 29, 2013. The respondents named are Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen–Boerenleenbank B.A. (‘Rabobank’) (0 individuals, 1 entity).
This library tags the matter as benchmark submission rigging, cash vs derivatives schemes and price manipulation, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
The conduct is recorded against futures and fx, with OTC identified in the release.
The relief recorded in our data is a financial penalty of £105 million, recorded in its native currency. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.
For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with 3 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Benchmark submission rigging — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Cash versus derivatives schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
- Price manipulation — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2013-10-29 FCA final notice
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-10-29 | FCA | FCA v. Coöperatieve Centrale Raiffeisen–Boerenleenbank B.A. (‘Rabobank’) (benchmark submission rigging, 2013) | Settled |
| 2013-10-29 | CFTC | CFTC v. Rabobank (benchmark submission rigging, 2013) | Settled |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CFTC v. Lloyds Banking Group and Lloyds Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2014) | CFTC | 2014-07-28 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes +1 | $105m | judgment |
| FCA v. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (benchmark submission rigging, 2013) | FCA | 2013-02-06 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Cash Vs Derivatives Schemes +2 | — | settled |
| CFTC v. Bank of America (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-19 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $30m | judgment |
| CFTC v. ICAP Capital Markets LLC (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-09-18 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $50m | judgment |
| CFTC v. BNP Paribas (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-08-29 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $90m | judgment |
| CFTC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank (benchmark submission rigging, 2018) | CFTC | 2018-06-18 | Benchmark Submission Rigging , Price Manipulation | $65m | judgment |