CFTC v. 4X Solutions, Chay (ponzi schemes, 2013)
Judgment entered
Checked against the primary document on October 4, 2026. The library's summary, tags and figures for this record were compared with the regulator's own document by an AI model (Claude) following written instructions, with sampled and disputed records read a second time. No lawyer has reviewed them. A checked record can still contain errors, and checked does not mean endorsed. See how we check records or report a correction.
In April 2013 the CFTC charged New York forex firm 4X Solutions, Inc. and its principal Whileon Chay in the Southern District of New York with fraud and misappropriation in a $4.8 million Ponzi scheme. The court entered a default judgment and injunction on April 17, 2015, and on January 29, 2016 ordered them jointly and severally to disgorge $2,745,226 and pay an $8,235,678 penalty.
The record
| Agency | CFTC |
|---|---|
| Release number | 6559-13 |
| Date filed | 2013-04-08 |
| Date resolved | 2016-01-29 |
| Court | U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York |
| Status | judgment |
| Criminal parallel | No |
| Bars imposed | conduct-based injunction |
| Defendants | 4X Solutions, Inc. ; Whileon Chay |
| Techniques | Ponzi schemes |
What was ordered
- Civil penalty
- $8.2m
- Disgorgement
- $2.7m
- Prejudgment interest
- —
- Total relief
- $11m
- Alleged gain
- —
What is alleged to have happened
The complaint alleged the defendants solicited about $4.8 million from at least 19 pool participants by promising returns of 24 to 36 percent a year. It alleged Chay lost about $2 million trading, misappropriated about $2.8 million to fund the firm and his own spending, and issued false statements, with purported returns paid from other participants' principal.
Outcome. According to the CFTC's February 8, 2016 release, Judge Richard Berman entered a default judgment and permanent injunction against both defendants on April 17, 2015, finding that they fraudulently solicited $4.8 million, and referred the amount of relief to a magistrate judge. On January 29, 2016 he adopted the recommendation and ordered disgorgement of $2,745,226 and a civil monetary penalty of $8,235,678, three times the misappropriated amount, joint and several. The release does not state whether restitution was ordered or whether any money was collected, and it warns that such orders may not result in recovery. This was a default, so the findings were not contested by the defendants.
This library tags the matter as ponzi schemes because the document describes payments to earlier participants made from later participants' money. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.
What technique is this, and how does it work?
This action is tagged with one technique in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.
- Ponzi schemes — see how it works, what statute it engages, and every other action tagged the same way.
Timeline
- 2013-04-08 CFTC release published
- 2016-01-29 Court orders disgorgement and civil monetary penalty (announced Feb. 8, 2016)
Primary documents
Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.
Same matter
The library links these 2 records because they appear to concern one matter: the same lead defendant, an overlapping technique tag and close filing dates, or a shared court docket or a release that cites the other. Records are listed by date filed.
| Date filed | Agency | Record | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2013-04-08 | CFTC | CFTC v. 4X Solutions, Chay (ponzi schemes, 2013) | Judgment entered |
| 2016-02-08 | CFTC | CFTC v. 4X Solutions and Whileon Chay (ponzi schemes, 2016) | Judgment entered |
Related actions
Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.
| Action | Agency | Filed | Technique | Penalty | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEC v. Mark D. Hanf and Hoai-Nam Chu Phan (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-09-04 | Ponzi Schemes | — | settled |
| SEC v. Leor Moshe, Jacob Goldman, Isaac Odes (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-13 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| CFTC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Goliath Ventures, Inc. and Christopher A. Delgado (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-08-11 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |
| SEC v. Aras Investment Business Group S.A.P.I. de C.V. and others (ponzi schemes, 2026) | SEC | 2026-07-24 | Ponzi Schemes | $449k | judgment |
| CFTC v. Trevor L. Vernon and Argent Capital Management LLC (ponzi schemes, 2026) | CFTC | 2026-07-07 | Ponzi Schemes | — | filed |