Market Manipulation. Search

CFTC v. Arya Motazedi (front running, 2015)

Judgment entered

Machine-extracted, pending human review. The structured fields on this page were parsed automatically from the regulator's own release, linked below. Read the primary document before relying on any figure here, and tell us if something is wrong.

In 2015, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission obtained a judgment against Arya Motazedi, alleging conduct this library classifies as front running and insider trading. The release records a civil penalty of $100,000.

The record

Structured fields for this action, as recorded in our case library.
Agency CFTC
Release number 7286-15
Date filed 2015-12-03
Date resolved 2015-12-03
Status judgment
Asset class commodities, futures
Venue CME, NYMEX
Criminal parallel No
Defendants Arya Motazedi (individual)
Techniques Front running , Insider trading

What was ordered

Civil penalty
$100k
Disgorgement
Prejudgment interest
Total relief
$100k
Alleged gain

A dash means the release did not state a figure we could extract, not that the figure is zero. Penalty and disgorgement are stored separately so aggregates across the library do not double-count the same dollars.

What is alleged to have happened

the Commodity Futures Trading Commission announced this matter on December 3, 2015 as release 7286-15. The respondents named are Arya Motazedi (1 individual, 0 entities).

This library tags the matter as front running and insider trading, based on the conduct the regulator describes. Each tag links to a page explaining how that technique works, what statute it engages, and what penalties comparable actions have attracted. The tagging is ours, not the regulator's: agencies charge statutory provisions, not technique names.

The conduct is recorded against commodities and futures, with CME, NYMEX identified in the release.

The relief recorded in our data is a civil monetary penalty of $100,000. Penalty and disgorgement are distinct: disgorgement returns the gain, while the penalty is punitive. We store them separately so that aggregate figures across the library are not double-counted.

For the regulator's own account of the facts, read the primary document linked above. This page deliberately summarises the structured record rather than reproducing the release.

What technique is this, and how does it work?

This action is tagged with 2 techniques in our taxonomy. The tagging is ours: regulators charge statutory provisions, not technique names, so the mapping is an editorial judgement described in our editorial policy.

Timeline

  1. 2015-12-03 CFTC release published

Primary documents

Everything on this page derives from the documents below. Where our summary and the primary document disagree, the primary document is right.

The linked release is a work of the United States government and is not subject to copyright. Our summary and narrative above are our own writing.

Other actions in the library sharing at least one technique tag with this one.

Action Agency Filed Technique Penalty Status
SEC v. Sean Wygovsky and Christopher Matthaei (front running, 2023) SEC 2023-03-31 Front Running , Insider Trading settled
CFTC v. Block Trade Broker (front running, 2018) CFTC 2018-09-28 Front Running , Insider Trading filed
SEC v. Mizuho Securities USA LLC (front running, 2018) SEC 2018-07-23 Front Running , Insider Trading +1 settled
SEC v. Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (front running, 2016) SEC 2016-10-12 Front Running , Insider Trading +1 $100k judgment
SEC v. Trijya Vakil and Neeraj Visen (insider trading, 2026) SEC 2026-09-04 Insider Trading judgment
CFTC v. Gabriel Perez (insider trading, 2026) CFTC 2026-08-28 Insider Trading $65k judgment

Record added September 8, 2026. submit a correction.